AI article

Antigravity_המדריך_המלא V1

The strongest AI systems are usually not the ones that remove people. They are the ones that place people at the right control points.

Human review is not failure

Teams still talk about review as if it proves the system is not mature enough. That framing is backward. In many workflows, review is the design that makes the system trustworthy enough to use.

The question is not whether a human is present. The question is where the human should step in: before action, after draft generation, at exception points, or only when confidence drops.

Bad pattern

A system that pretends to be fully autonomous, then quietly relies on people to clean up errors downstream.

Better pattern

A system that is explicit about draft mode, approvals, escalation, and what happens when inputs are messy.

Autonomy without clear intervention points is usually not elegant. It is just harder to debug.

AI sample page using the floating sticky nav pattern.